Updated

MegaETH Daily Digest — April 15, 2026

Daily Transactions — 4 Weeks2.0M2.2M2.4M2.6MMar 18Mar 22Mar 26Mar 30Apr 3Apr 7Apr 11Apr 15
Daily Transactions — 4 Weeks
Unique Wallets — 4 Weeks2K4K6K8K10KMar 18Mar 22Mar 26Mar 30Apr 3Apr 7Apr 11Apr 15
Unique Wallets — 4 Weeks

At a Glance


MegaETH stayed in its steady mid-20s TPS regime on Wednesday, but participation thinned out meaningfully. In broader risk-off market conditions, onchain activity looked more selective: fewer active wallets, while a handful of venues concentrated usage and gas.

The Week So Far

The last two weeks have been notably stable on throughput: April 15 landed at 25.6 TPS, and the seven-day drift is essentially flat (+0.2%). Week-over-week, the network is unchanged at ~25.8 TPS on average, with the usual weekend dip still intact (this weekend averaged 25.1 TPS vs 24.6 TPS last weekend).

TPS — Last 14 Days24252627Apr 1Apr 3Apr 5Apr 7Apr 9Apr 11Apr 13Apr 15
TPS — Last 14 Days

Where things did move was breadth. Daily transactions have mostly held in a tight band (roughly 2.1M–2.3M across April), but unique wallets have been choppier: April 8 (5.8K) and April 10 (5.6K) stood out, while April 15 fell to 2.6K, the lowest point in the four-week table. That combination—stable throughput but fewer distinct senders—often means activity is concentrating into fewer operators (automation, power users, or app-specific bursts) rather than broad-based usage.

The Day

The hourly tape on April 15 was mostly smooth: a softer late morning (24.3–24.9 TPS from 09:00–12:00 UTC), then a gradual afternoon ramp that topped out at 26.9 TPS around 15:00 UTC. A second, smaller evening push showed up at 19:00 UTC alongside the day’s highest hourly gas rate (8.3 Mgas/s).

TPS — Today Hourly24.52525.52626.52700:0003:0006:0009:0012:0015:0018:0021:0022:00
TPS — Today Hourly

Despite that calm hourly shape, two “needle” events punctured the day. In the last-24h performance insights, network TPS briefly hit 67.0 TPS at 11:46 UTC and network gas spiked to 2,677 Mgas/s at 23:13 UTC—both attributed to World Markets - Exchange as the top contributor in those windows (568 tx and 23.7 Mgas respectively). These look like short, concentrated bursts rather than a sustained load increase; if you want to dig in, the fastest path is the Insights feed and the Contracts Explorer.

On the app side, the leaderboard was split between “transactions” and “people”:

Top DApps — 24h TransactionsCrossy Fluffle3.0KKumbaya2.7KFerdy.bet1.4KAvon823Intraverse735Canonic504Showdown388TopStrike134
Top DApps — 24h Transactions

A few under-the-hood shifts also stood out in the 24h change detection:

Health Check

Network reliability improved on April 15: 0.2% failed transactions (5.1K failed out of 2.21M) versus 0.5% on April 14. Nothing here suggests systemic instability.

The only “performance concerns” were the two isolated spikes (67.0 TPS and 2,677 Mgas/s). Spikes like these can come from bots, bursts of matching/settlement, or tightly packed transactions from a single venue; importantly, they were brief enough not to pull the daily averages out of their normal range.

The Takeaway

April 15 was a stable-throughput, lower-participation day: 2.21M transactions held near recent norms, but 2.6K unique wallets indicates activity concentrated into fewer hands. App usage skewed toward Kumbaya and Avon for broad participation, while performance outliers centered on World Markets - Exchange.

On the Road to TGE, the “Live Mafia Apps” counter remains at 6/10, and no app cleared the $50K/day threshold on April 15 (total fees across all apps: $15K). If you’re tracking milestones, the most relevant connection from this day is that Kumbaya remained active on users while still printing $5K in fees—progress, but not yet the sustained fee level the program targets (megaeth.com/token).

Data sources: Analysis by MiniBlocks.io using on-chain MegaETH data. Market sentiment data from Alternative.me Crypto Fear & Greed Index. TVL and stablecoin data from DeFiLlama. TGE progress from megaeth.com.

Curious how this digest is made? Read about our AI-powered methodology.
This report is generated automatically by AI and may contain errors or inaccuracies. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. MiniBlocks is an independent analytics platform and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or promoting any project mentioned. Always verify data independently and do your own research.
About failure rates: This report covers raw network-level metrics. High failure rates for a contract or DApp do not necessarily indicate poor app quality. Common causes include bot activity (front-running, sniping), race conditions during launches and mints, intentional access gating, and rate-limiting mechanisms that deliberately reject excess transactions.
2026-04-14