Updated

MegaETH Daily Digest — May 24, 2026

Daily Transactions — 4 Weeks2.5M3.0M3.5M4.0MApr 26Apr 30May 4May 8May 12May 16May 20May 24
Daily Transactions — 4 Weeks
Unique Wallets — 4 Weeks10K20K30K40KApr 26Apr 30May 4May 8May 12May 16May 20May 24
Unique Wallets — 4 Weeks

At a Glance


Sunday, May 24 was a familiar weekend profile: overall quiet-to-steady baseline activity with a couple of very sharp bursts. The bigger story isn’t raw throughput—MegaETH stayed within its recent range—but user breadth continued to narrow, which fits the current cautious market conditions.

The Week So Far

MegaETH is settling into a stable band after last week’s higher midweek prints: this week is averaging 29.4 TPS vs 30.5 TPS last week (-3.3%), and the weekend dip is intact (this weekend 28.5 TPS vs last weekend 29.3 TPS). The busiest day over the last 14 days remains Friday, May 15 (33.4 avg / 39.6 peak TPS), while Saturday, May 23 was the quietest (26.7 avg TPS).

On the “real usage” side, the 4-week view shows transaction totals holding in the ~2.3M–2.8M/day zone recently, but unique wallets have drifted lower through the week, reaching 3.9K on May 24. That’s the clearest sign the network is being driven by fewer active operators even when headline volume holds up.

TPS — Last 14 Days2628303234May 10May 12May 14May 16May 18May 20May 22May 24
TPS — Last 14 Days

The Day

The hourly rhythm on May 24 was mostly flat (high-20s TPS) with one standout lift at 14:00 UTC (32.1 TPS / 10.2 Mgas/s). Under that smooth hourly curve, the network also saw brief, very sharp micro-spikes: 73.0 TPS at 14:12 UTC and 202.1 Mgas/s at 22:16 UTC—both flagged as World Markets-driven windows.

TPS — Today Hourly27282930313200:0003:0006:0009:0012:0015:0018:0021:0022:00
TPS — Today Hourly

App flow was top-heavy:

A couple of smaller moves stood out:

Contract-level anomalies to note:

Top DApps — 24h TransactionsWorld Markets190.2KEuphoria43.4KOffshore Protocol13.8KFerdy.bet3.2KKumbaya2.9KPump Party1.9KgTrade | Gains Ne…1.5KTopStrike970
Top DApps — 24h Transactions

Health Check

Network-wide failures rose to 0.6% (14.0K failed TX) on May 24—still not alarming in absolute terms, but clearly above the 0.2–0.3% that’s been common this week.

One contract drove a meaningful slice of that elevation: 0x517d695547270b9ee2f3cbb2d7e17efd5dd40eb3 saw a failure spike to 42.0% around 14:00 UTC (2,112 failed out of 5,027), coincident with a high-activity hour (5,027 tx/h). In practice, spikes like this often reflect competition mechanics (bots racing, throttling, or access-control reverts) rather than a generalized network issue—but it’s a real reliability signal for that specific interaction window. (See: https://miniblocks.io/contracts/0x517d695547270b9ee2f3cbb2d7e17efd5dd40eb3)

The Takeaway

May 24 was a steady weekend baseline with two clear “needle spikes,” and the day’s volume increase (2.44M TX) came alongside a continued contraction in unique wallets (3.9K). In the current risk-off backdrop, that mix—stable throughput, narrower participation—fits a market leaning more on automation and fewer active operators.

On TGE tracking (https://www.megaeth.com/token), nothing materially advanced: Live Mafia Apps remains at 6/10 and fees still show $0K for the day, even as qualifying-app activity (notably Kumbaya and Showdown) continues to generate onchain motion. The near-term watch is whether weekday flow brings wallets back, or whether concentration remains the dominant theme.

Data sources: Analysis by MiniBlocks.io using on-chain MegaETH data. Market sentiment data from Alternative.me Crypto Fear & Greed Index. TVL and stablecoin data from DeFiLlama. TGE progress from megaeth.com.

Curious how this digest is made? Read about our AI-powered methodology.
This report is generated automatically by AI and may contain errors or inaccuracies. It is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or trading advice. MiniBlocks is an independent analytics platform and is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or promoting any project mentioned. Always verify data independently and do your own research.
About failure rates: This report covers raw network-level metrics. High failure rates for a contract or DApp do not necessarily indicate poor app quality. Common causes include bot activity (front-running, sniping), race conditions during launches and mints, intentional access gating, and rate-limiting mechanisms that deliberately reject excess transactions.
2026-05-23